• Home
  • >
  • RESOURCES
  • >
  • You’re paying partner rates for work that doesn’t need a partner.

You’re paying partner rates for work that doesn’t need a partner.

Dan Vanrenen
June 2, 2026

The Maths Nobody Runs

Take a partner at a mid-market PE firm. All-in cost to the business: somewhere north of £500k a year. That's roughly £250 an hour, assuming a standard working week. Most partners don't work standard weeks.

Now ask what that partner did yesterday.

Somewhere in the answer is a CIM review that an associate could have summarised. A data room navigation they personally opened because nobody set up a tracker. An email chain chasing an adviser for documents that should have been requested three days earlier by someone else. A prep call they sat on because the brief was never written.

None of it required their judgement. All of it cost partner rates.

What Senior Judgement Actually Is

Senior judgement is the thing that cannot be delegated. The ability to read a management team in a room. The pattern recognition from seeing fifty deals that flags a risk before it surfaces in the model. The call on whether to push harder or walk away.

That is what the firm is paying for. That is what wins deals, protects capital, and builds the track record that raises the next fund.

Everything else - the coordination, the chasing, the formatting, the status updates, the repeat research - is overhead wearing a senior person's time.

The problem is that in most deal teams, there is no clear line between the two.

How It Happens

Senior people don't set out to do junior work. It accumulates.

A document needs finding and the analyst is on another call. A question comes in from the adviser and it's quicker to answer it directly. The model needs a sensitivity before the IC and there isn't time to brief someone else properly. The data room has no structure, so the partner navigates it themselves because they can do it faster.

Each instance is rational. Cumulatively, they represent hours a week of senior capacity disappearing into work that generates no commercial return at that level.

The firms that compound an edge over time are the ones that treat this as a structural problem, not an individual one.

The Commercial Impact

This is not an efficiency talking point. It is a deal velocity question.

A partner with four hours of reclaimed time per week has the capacity to run an additional live process, go deeper on a management team before IC, or spend proper time on a deal that needs conviction before the process gets competitive.

At fund level, that compounds. More processes run with the same headcount. Better diligence on the deals that matter. Senior attention concentrated on the moments that actually move outcomes.

The cost of not fixing it isn't visible on a P&L. It shows up in the deals that moved too slowly, the processes the firm wasn't sharp enough to win, and the IC decisions made on thinner information than they should have been.

The Question Worth Asking

Track a senior person's time for one week. Not at the level of meetings versus desk time - at the level of what each task actually required.

Which of those tasks required their specific judgement? Which could have been done by someone more junior with the right brief and the right structure around them?

The gap between those two answers is the operational opportunity. And in most firms, it is larger than anyone expects.

The Growth Memo.

Join our weekly newsletter for the latest insights and strategies to keep your deal team ahead of the competition.

Discover more from Growth Hub

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading